*UPDATE*

I have updated my review and giveaway policies page (now just titled Policies above). If you are entering a giveaway, please read and abide by the applicable policy.

Attention Authors! If you arrived here looking for information on the Two Sides to Every Story guest post series, see the tab at the top of the page for more info!


Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Catherine the Great. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catherine the Great. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Two Sides to Every Story: Crusaders and Infidels by Jennifer Laam


Today I have the wonderful opportunity to welcome Jennifer Laam, author of The Secret Daughter of the Tsar and the just recently released The Tsarina's Legacy, to The Maiden's Court with an awesome contribution to the Two Sides to Every Story series.  Laam, whose novels are set in Russia, brings us today a guest post about two of the great men in the fight for the Crimea.  I hope you will enjoy it - I learned a lot from reading it!

Crusaders and Infidels: Grigory Potemkin, Ghazi Hassan Pasha, and the Rise of the Russian Empire in the Crimea
Grigory Potemkin
Image Credit: Johann Baptist von Lampi the Elder [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons {{PD-old-100}}
On the day Catherine the Great seized the Russian throne, a lowly member of the horse guards dared to approach her with an impromptu gift. Twenty-two years old and keenly ambitious, Grigory Potemkin noticed that to complete her dashing soldier’s outfit, his new sovereign needed a sword knot or dragonne. From that moment on, Grigory Potemkin, the product of a provincial family of the minor nobility, would rise both in his career at court and in the affections of his new monarch. 

Years later, Grigory and Catherine would enjoy a short, but torrid, mid-life romance. Even after the affair ended, Grigory Potemkin retained a unique hold on Catherine’s heart and mind. They continued on as friends and Grigory became Catherine’s most influential advisor, forging a powerful personal and political alliance. Over the course of his illustrious career, Grigory was awarded various titles, including Grand Admiral and Prince of Tauride, the ancient name for the Crimea.

Yet it was not personal charisma nor his chemistry with Catherine alone that allowed Grigory to rise. Prince Grigory Potemkin was a decorated hero of the first and second Russo-Turkish Wars, the ongoing conflicts between the Russian and Ottoman Empires which began in the eighteenth century. The first war took place when he was still a young man, affording Grigory a prime opportunity to stand apart from other ambitious courtiers and attain glory. He distinguished himself on the field and used this newfound stature as a means to elevate himself politically and rise in Catherine’s estimation. Russian victories meant strategic access to the Black Sea and domain over the Crimea, where Grigory’s greatest accomplishments occurred: the development of Russia’s formidable Black Sea Fleet and the establishment of towns and burgeoning industries in the region. By the time of the second war, when the Ottoman Empire attempted to regain control of the Black Sea, Grigory Potemkin was both a seasoned statesman and a veteran military leader who commanded forces and won brutally decisive victories against the Ottomans, further securing his hold on power.

To some extent, the Russo-Turkish Wars were viewed by Russians as a Christian crusade. From Grigory Potemkin’s point of view, the expansion of Russian territory to the south and east had a spiritual imperative. Grigory and Catherine were enmeshed in an intriguing if ultimately unsuccessful plot known as “The Greek Project” or “Greek Scheme” to reclaim Constantinople. If the plan had reached fruition, Catherine’s second born grandson, Constantine, would eventually inherit and reign over this part of the Russian empire.

Yet for all of these grand ambitions, Prince Potemkin was hardly a fanatical religious crusader. On the contrary, Grigory Potemkin had a curious, tolerant, and highly respectful attitude toward those of other faiths. He instituted protective measures for the Muslim Tatars of the Crimea who would prove to be strategic allies, made financial donations to mosques, and ensured that prominent Tatars were given titles and the right to own land. Both Catherine and Grigory took appointments with muftis. Eventually, Tatars used the Koran to swear allegiance to the Russian Empress Catherine. Furthermore, as part of negotiations near the close of the second war, Prince Potemkin proposed construction of a mosque in Moscow itself.

The Russo-Turkish Wars granted Grigory Potemkin an esteemed and constant place in Empress Catherine’s court and the chance to engage Muslim people in the life of the Russian Empire. It was a key component of his political strength and historical legacy. For those on the opposite side of the struggle, however the Russo-Turkish Wars had a far different effect.

By the mid-eighteenth century, the Ottomans still ruled a vast empire. In contrast to Russia, however, which had been energized by Peter the Great and his successors, including Catherine, the transnational empire of the Turks showed hints of decline. While still all powerful, sultans were limited by Islamic fundamentalism and their own military-political complex. The second Russo-Turkish War might never have happened were it not for the badgering of European powers hoping to limit the influence and stretch of the rising Russian Empire. Whereas the conflict allowed Potemkin first to rise and then to flourish, ambitious and talented men on the other side of the battle field were destined to be destroyed.
Ghazi Hassan Pasha
By Cobija (Own work) [CC0], via Wikimedia Commons

Ghazi Hassan Pasha, sometimes referred to as “Hassan of Algiers” was one such great man. Once enslaved and a one-time pirate of the Barbary Coast, the ambitious and talented “Capitan-Pasha” or Grand Admiral had risen to the top of the Ottoman ranks. By the time of the second Russo-Turkish War, he was also known as “The Crocodile of Sea Battles,” a longstanding warrior for his sultan who had blockaded Acre and suppressed internal revolts against the empire in Egypt. In the first Russo-Turkish War, he saved his own forces from the otherwise disastrous battle of Chesme. The conflict took on a religious cast for the Ottomans as it had for the Russians, and the name “Ghazi” stuck to the admiral as the result of his honorable fighting against the “great infidels,” the Russians. Still, similarly to Grigory Potemkin, Ghazi Hassan Pasha’s personal view of religion was likely nuanced; his own father had been Georgian and reportedly of the Orthodox faith.

Like Grigory Potemkin, Ghazi Hassan Pasha left the battlefields of the first Russo-Turkish War a military hero. After defeat in that first war, Ghazi Hassan Pasha took charge of restructuring the Ottoman Navy. In a manner comparable to what Catherine’s historical precursor, Peter the Great, had undertaken in Russia, he sought to utilize the skills of the western powers to the benefit of his empire. Ghazi Hassan Pasha established new shipyards and schools, employed French engineers and English ship-designers, and hoped to professionalize the service. Though his Golden Horn Shipyard would later evolve into the Turkish Naval Academy, at the time his educational efforts met with limited success. For the most part, officers were still appointed not by virtue of merit or training, but via corrupt systems and political intrigue. This failure to install effective leadership would eventually return to haunt the admiral.

Ghazi Hassan Pasha understood the threat Catherine’s territorial ambitions posed and how severely Russia’s annexation of the Crimea had undermined Ottoman strength. His reforms were thus geared toward preparing Ottoman forces for reengagement with the Russian intruders. However, by the time political and popular opinion, bolstered by the European powers, swung once again, in favor of reengaging the “great infidels,” he advised caution. Ghazi Hassan Pasha felt, sensibly, that the empire first needed to contain internal threats. Furthermore, while Great Britain and Prussia were eager for the chance to weaken Russia, and had offered moral support to the Ottoman Empire, Ghazi Hassan Pasha argued, they had not offered manpower, nor treasure.

Nonetheless, when the decision was made to engage in war to regain the Crimea, Ghazi Hassan Pasha, now well into his eighties, was once again engaged in the thick of the battle. Despite his efforts to reinvigorate his naval forces, he suffered fatal losses, including a failure to protect the waters surrounding the crucial fortress of Ochakov, which was later subject to a prolonged siege and brutal attack by Russian forces commanded by Grigory Potemkin.

While the second round of the Russo-Turkish Wars helped solidify Grigory Potemkin’s hold on power, the elderly Ghazi Hassan Pasha was politically devastated by his humiliating defeats and lost the popular support he once enjoyed in Constantinople. Pushing for peace in his final role as grand vizier to the sultan, he was involved in negotiations with Grigory Potemkin’s agents. However, before a treaty could be finalized, Ghazi Hassan Pasha died in 1790 under suspicious circumstances. He is widely believed to have been poisoned by the sultan’s order, for his failures in battle and because the Ottomans had decided to abandon the peace talks with Russia. Upon news of the great admiral’s death, Catherine even advised Grigory Potemkin to take care lest he be the next victim of one of the sultan’s assassins.

 
As a novelist, I can only speculate as to the true nature of the relationship between these military rivals. I wonder if Grigory Potemkin had lingering guilt over his direct role in the brutality of the wars and his indirect role in his rival’s death. At the very least, I believe Prince Potemkin would have acknowledged how easily he might have been on the losing side of the conflict and suffered as a result, if not poisoned by his own empress for his shortcomings, then at least banished to a lowly civilian life outside the court. When the prince died in 1791, on a hillside in Bessarabia, he was surrounded by an entourage of religious figures that included muftis. I can’t help but think Prince Potemkin was quite capable of seeing both sides of any story.

Jennifer Laam is the author of The Secret Daughter of the Tsar and The Tsarina’s Legacy, as well as the forthcoming Lady Pushkin, all from St. Martin’s Press. She is represented by Erin Harris at Folio Literary Management. Jennifer earned her undergraduate degree in History and Russian Studies at the University of the Pacific, and her master’s degree in History from Oakland University in Michigan. She has lived in Los Angeles and the suburbs of Detroit, and traveled in Russia and Europe. She currently resides in Northern California, where she spends her time writing, reading, and line dancing.  You can find Jennifer on the following social media sites: Website | Blog | Facebook | Twitter | Pinterest | Goodreads

 
Buy The Tsarina's Legacy: Amazon | Barnes & Noble | RJ Julia














Book Blurb:
Then...Grigory "Grisha" Potemkin has had a successful long association with the powerful Empress Catherine of Russia. But Catherine and Grisha are older now and face new threats, both from powers outside of Russia and from those close to them. Haunted by the horrors of his campaign against the Muslim Turks, Grisha hopes to construct a mosque in the heart of the empire. Unfortunately, Catherine's much younger new lover, the ambitious Platon Zubov, stands in his way. Grisha determines that to preserve Catherine's legacy he must save her from Zubov's dangerous influence and win back her heart.
Now...When she learns she is the lost heiress to the Romanov throne, Veronica Herrera's life turns upside down. Dmitry Potemkin, one of Grisha's descendants, invites Veronica to Russia to accept a ceremonial position as Russia's new tsarina. Seeking purpose, Veronica agrees to act as an advocate to free a Russian artist sentenced to prison for displaying paintings critical of the church and government. Veronica is both celebrated and chastised. As her political role comes under fire, Veronica is forced to decide between the glamorous perks of European royalty and staying true to herself.
In Jennifer Laam's The Tsarina's Legacy, unexpected connections between Grisha and Veronica are revealed as they struggle to make peace with the ghosts of their past and help secure a better future for themselves and the country they both love.
 



Copyright © 2016 by The Maiden’s Court

Friday, June 8, 2012

Guest Post by Paula Paul

I would like to welcome author Paula Paul to The Maiden’s Court today.  Paula has recently released her novel Sins of the Empress about Catherine the Great and has stopped by to share with us how this novel came to be. 

How Catherine Came to Me

Guest Post by Paula Paul, author of
Sins of the Empress

sinsoftheempress

            “Write a historical novel about a real woman,” an editor said.  “Do you have anyone in mind?”

            I was about to say no, that I would have to think about it, when I got a kind of creepy feeling on the back of my neck.  I turned around in my office chair to face one of my many book shelves, and I saw the brown spine of an old book that had long ago lost its cover.  On the spine was Catherine the Great.  In the next second, those three words were coming out of my mouth.  “Perfect!” the editor said.  “Send me the first chapter when you get it written.”

            I had read that old brown book a very long time ago when I was in my twenties and was asked to review it for a newspaper.  Now, I could hardly remember it.  She was the empress of Russia.  That’s about all I could recall about the book except that she came from a country other than Russia.  I couldn’t remember what country.  By now I was asking myself why I’d made such an off-the-top-of-my-head suggestion.

            The truth was, however, I knew why.  It was because every time I saw that book on my shelf, usually when I was looking for something else or maybe trying to find a way to squeeze just one more book in somewhere, I would get an eerie feeling that Catherine was calling out to me to read more about her.  That book had been so dull and tedious I had always been reluctant to tackle it again, though.  Still, she’s been relentless in her urging, and now she had me trapped.  I had no choice but to read about her again.

            Dull and tedious?  I don’t think so.  Not Catherine.  I found that out within seconds after I started reading articles about her on the Internet.  Then I bought books.  Lots of books, and the more I read, the more enthralled I became.  I read books about her and about her lovers, about her family and about her enemies.  I read her memoirs, and I read books that she had read.  Some of them of those law books she read were pretty tough going.  I even reread that old book on my shelf, and yes, it is still dull.  I wonder what kind of review I gave it.  It was so long ago I can’t remember.

By the time I’d finished my research, I knew her quite well, and I understood why she kept calling out to me to read more and finally to write about her.  I felt she wanted me to tell a story of her soul, her feelings, her desires, and fears.  Not just straight history.

  She wanted me to try to interpret on the page how she felt when, as a young German princess brought to Russia to be married, her husband, although an adult, didn’t understand sex and brought toy soldiers to bed.  She wanted me to allow readers to know her heartache when her children were taken away from her, to let readers smell the incense in the unfamiliar orthodox church she had to attend, to allow them to experience her despair when she was betrayed by the man she loved and experience the cold grip of fear when she was accused of murder.

It took me a year of hard work to write her story and then to rewrite it.  Catherine was there through it all, giving me her approval or, all too often, her disapproval, making me write with more feeling.  I was exhausted when I finished, and I didn’t want to hear from her or even think about her again.

But then the book was published, and I got my advance copy.  I opened it, and read the first sentence.

All that I have ever done, I have done for love.

There she was, telling her story, inviting others to read it and to become as mesmerized by her as I was.  I hope you will accept her invitation.

Paula_Paul_photo

Thank you Paula for that wonderful story of how Catherine reached out and grabbed your attention as a writer.  You can visit Paula or check out her books on her website or blog.

 

Copyright © 2012 by The Maiden’s Court

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Catherine the Great and Peter III - An Ill Fated Marriage

In honor of Notorious Royal Marriages week at the Historical Fiction Bloggers Round Table - I selected the marriage of Catherine the Great and Peter III of Russia to highlight here.

As was common practice for the majority of royal marriages, the union of Catherine and Peter was an arranged marriage for political purposes. Peter was the heir to the Russian throne and because she would one day be queen, Catherine had to face a great many tests before she was ultimately chosen for his wife. Shortly after her sixteenth birthday, Catherine and Peter married. But newlywed life would not be blissful – Peter was constantly ill and he enjoyed playing games like a boy half his age. It was only though the encouragement of other members of the court that their marriage was consummated. They would have one son, Paul, who would one day rule Russia.

In 1762, Peter became Emperor of Russia. Due to political failings and his immature attitude – Peter was deposed and killed within 6 months of taking the throne. This left Catherine husbandless and in complete control of Russia.

Catherine had taken on a string of lovers, even during her marriage to Peter, but would not marry again. Her most notable lovers were Sergei Saltykov Grigory Potemkin, Stanislaw Poniatowski, and Grigory Orlov. Catherine treated her lovers very well, rewarding them with lands, money, and titles during and after their affair ended. Catherine had a son with Orlov, named Aleksey Bobrinsky, and a daughter with Poniatowski, named Anna Petrovna. Catherine secretly claimed that Paul was the son of Saltykov, but he so much resembled Peter that it is most likely untrue.

Catherine died in 1796 at the age of 67 from a stroke. The crown would pass on to her son, Paul.

Catherine is another one of those women whose husband really wasn’t interested in playing the role of a husband. But she lucked out and got the upper hand after his death – ruling Russia without a husband and taking on a string of lovers – how much better could it get after what she had in her marriage!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Be sure to stop by the other Round Table events today:
Interview with Leslie Carroll at The Burton Review
Book Review at Historical-Fiction.com
Guest Post by Leslie Carroll at All Things Royal




Copyright © 2009-2011 by The Maiden’s Court