*UPDATE*

I have updated my review and giveaway policies page (now just titled Policies above). If you are entering a giveaway, please read and abide by the applicable policy.

Attention Authors! If you arrived here looking for information on the Two Sides to Every Story guest post series, see the tab at the top of the page for more info!


Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Elizabeth Bailey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Elizabeth Bailey. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Guest Post by Elizabeth Bailey

Today I have the opportunity to host Elizabeth Bailey who wrote a very interesting guest post for us on tobacco use in Georgian times.  Elizabeth writes a historical mystery series, the Lady Fan Mysteries.  Without further ado, please read on !

Pipes, Snuff, and Poison

Guest Post by Elizabeth Bailey, Author of
The Deathly Portent

Book cover of The Deathly Portent by Elizabeth Bailey

Looking at images of Georgian life, one gets the impression that the use of tobacco was neither general nor widespread. Caricatures tend to depict an exaggerated truth, and only in a few does one find a pipe smoker, and in none a man taking snuff.

Rowlandson shows one soldier smoking in a group of five, and similarly one working man among seven in a pub. A few men are depicted taking a pipe at their own hearth. Ackermann’s Fleet Prison yard, with groups enough to form a crowd, has one lone fellow with smoke issuing from his long clay pipe. Only Hogarth has half the males smoking pipes in a single group, and that is in a scene of drunken debauch!

Hogarth

It seems fair to assume, then, that although smoking was prevalent not everyone indulged in the habit; those who did confined their pipes to the pub, the coffee house or home. One can also be confident that far fewer women than men took tobacco at all, although an image of an elderly working class dame with a pipe pops up occasionally.

Clearly many did use snuff, because it was a high production trade and is mentioned in contemporary accounts. But although tobacco had a place, it seems unlikely that its use was anything like as widespread as it was during the earlier years of the twentieth century. Yet those Georgians who disapproved of the use of tobacco appear convinced that it was highly prevalent in their own time.

I have not yet killed off a character with tobacco, but I well might. The dangers were known. Tobacco is listed in a late 18th Century treatise on poisons. According to the writer, there was evidence to suggest it was an active poison, “yet everyone knows that under the influence of habit it is used in immense quantities over the whole world as an article of luxury, without any bad effect having ever been clearly traced to it.”

Much was made of the effects of snuff on workmen who manufactured it, some sources claiming it gave them bronchitis and dysentery among other ailments, but others managed to prove that workmen became used to it and didn’t suffer any ill effects. As ever, those with a vested interest will find a way to prove their point!

Such symptoms as were noted are known to us now: speeded up heart rate, giddiness, shortness of breath, spasms, fainting, sickness, weak pulse and sleepiness. One doctor suspected apoplexy (heart attack) “is one of the evils in train of that disgusting practice”, referring to taking snuff. Two young men actually died from tobacco poisoning, having smoked about “seventeen pipes at a sitting”. One wonders how that compares with 20 or 40 a day now?

We are indebted to a French chemist of the era, Vauquelin, for naming the killer substance in tobacco as nicotine. Later chemists argued about which precise part of tobacco caused the problems, but it was generally agreed that tobacco contained an “acrid, alkaline principle and an essential oil to which the alkaloid adheres with great obstinacy”, which was bad news.

As early as King James, who wrote “The Counter-Blaste to Tobacco” within a few years of its introduction into Europe by Sir Walter Raleigh, it was believed that the smoking habit would result in “evil consequences” because of its poisonous qualities. Some governments tried to stop its introduction, although their methods were harsher than our current bans on smoking in public places. Popes excommunicated those who smoked in St Peters; in Russia it was punished with amputation of the nose; and in the Canton of Bern it ranked next to adultery.

Did that make any difference? Not according to the treatise writer: “Like every other persecuted novelty, however, smoking and snuff-taking passed from place to place with rapidity; and now there appear to be only two luxuries which yield to it in prevalence, spirituous liquors and tea.”

Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chôse!

I suspect the anti-tobacco sentiment we now live with had its effect on my writing without conscious decision, because Francis does not indulge in this habit, although Ottilia is addicted to coffee. But one could not faithfully write of the Georgian world without including tobacco, and Jeremiah Wagstaff fills the bill in The Deathly Portent, smoking his clay pipe in his corner of the Cock and Bottle.

Elizabeth Bailey, author

Thanks Elizabeth for this wonderful post!  It has been great to have you here!  The Deathly Portent is available in the US in April and the UK in June.  You can visit Elizabeth at her website for more information about her books.

 

Copyright © 2012 by The Maiden’s Court

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Interview with Elizabeth Bailey

Historical crime novels are a genre that is relatively new to me - I think I have only read one that would sort of fall into this category.  I had the opportunity to interview Elizabeth Bailey for the release of her first historical crime novel, set in England's Georgian period.  Please help me welcome Elizabeth to The Maiden's Court!  Also, stay tuned at the end of the post for a giveaway of her new novel.

You have written several historical romance novels in the past – what inspired you to now begin writing historical crime novels? Do you incorporate any of the skill you have acquired from romance writing into your crime writing, or is it a very different style of writing?

I'd had the basic idea of the first book for a long time - years in fact. It was originally intended as a sprawling big historical series, but the genre wasn't doing well at the time so I shelved it. I think my brother was the one who suggested it could be crime and I liked that idea and jotted notes about it, but never did anything about it. I wasn't sure I could do it, to be honest. I've always loved the mystery crime novel - Agatha Christie, Ellis Peters, Ngaio Marsh were favourites - and I didn't think I had the skill to emulate them.

I started thinking about crime again when I found I was getting stale with romance. The genre changed a lot and I just wasn't enjoying it as much any more. It was a conscious choice to use the same historical period. I love late Georgian, when most of my romances are set, and of course my research knowledge was already extensive. Because of that, there is a lot of my romance style in the crime novels in terms of behaviour, language and giving a flavour of the period.

What's different is the freedom to build the Georgian world more, with lots of peripheral characters and sub-plots concerning the lives of the victims. With romance you have to keep the story primarily to the hero and heroine. This is the main reason I am enjoying it so very much. Also the crime aspect is new to me and that is fascinating.

Being rather new to the genre myself – how does a historical crime novel differ from a contemporary crime novel?

I suspect the main difference is in the policing and the interference of authority. In contemporary crime you can't avoid police involvement, and I imagine it's a lot more difficult for your amateur sleuth to operate around the crime scene. There wasn't much of a police force in the Georgian era, and crime and punishment was much more rough and ready, so your sleuth has a freer hand. You also don't have much forensic help, and although medical knowledge went some way to understanding the condition of a body after death and what that meant, the detective has to rely heavily on witness evidence and supposition. It certainly stretches the writer's ingenuity to find ways of revealing physical clues to help!

Why did you set your new series in the Georgian period?

I seem to have covered this earlier. I would add that the Georgian world offers even more to me as an author of crime than of romance. I've got a society with enormous economic differences in its various layers, from the criminal underworld and the many aspects of the man in the street, through domestic servants, the middle classes, "gentry" and the aristocracy. This offers so much opportunity for diverse characters and allows Ottilia to delve into any social arena to find out what she needs to know.

Are there any characteristics of your heroine, Ottilia, in you? Are you one that likes to watch crime shows and try to figure them out?

Oh dear, I am sure there are! Writers of necessity use a lot of their own understanding of ethics or morality to inform the minds of characters. And your heroine, although flawed, has got to be at heart a person of integrity or the reader wouldn't be sympathetic. I can't think of any fictional detective who isn't, which I believe is why some writers can successfully make rather unpleasant heroes somewhat likeable. And of course, if Ottilia can work it out, I've got to be able to as well. Though I suspect she is cleverer than I am! Characters do tend to run their authors ragged, and boss them about.

Yes, I love crime shows, but chiefly mysteries. I find TV adaptations easier to figure out than the original books because the medium is so different and it's hard to include everything. We have a great tradition of TV mysteries here in the UK and you'll find me glued to Poirot, Midsomer Murders and Cadfael. I'm also very attached to Angela Lansbury's sleuth in Murder She Wrote.


What types of books do you like to read when you have some spare time?

I'm a huge Harry Potter fan, and a couple of years ago I discovered Terry Pratchett and read everything voraciously. I enjoy romance as well as crime, and I used to read lots of historicals. But I can also settle to a classic like Dickens or Jane Austen, perhaps Daphne du Maurier, and I dip into the occasional literary novel. If it's well written and grabs me, I can read pretty much anything. Does that say I'm a writer? Oh, and I love Shakespeare - no surprise since I have a strong theatre background.


An avid reader from an early age, Elizabeth Bailey grew up in colonial Africa under unconventional parentage and with theatre in the blood. Back in England, she trod the boards until discovering her true métier as a writer in her thirties, when she fulfilled an early addiction to Georgette Heyer by launching into historical romance. Eight years and eight books later, Elizabeth joined the Harlequin Mills & Boon stable, fuelling her writing with a secondary career teaching and directing drama, and writing plays into the bargain.

With 18 historicals published, she began to concentrate on the mainstream and in 2005, Elizabeth’s novel Fly the Wild Echoes was released in both the UK and the US simultaneously by Unlimited Publishing. The novel was a contender in the Booker list for that year. A mystery – a whodunit of the mind, as one reader has it – the book explores the interwoven lives of three women and investigates the possibility of past lives.

Now retired from teaching, Elizabeth directs for a local theatre group where she lives in West Sussex. Recently, however, even this foray into drama has had to take a back seat as she changed direction to enter the world of crime.

You can find more about Elizabeth and her books at her website.

Now for the giveaway - I have one copy open to those of you living in the US.  Giveaway ends September 17th.  Just fill out the form below.




Copyright © 2011 by The Maiden’s Court